翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ R&R (EastEnders) ・ R&R (magazine) ・ R&R (military) ・ R&R (Rare & Remixed) ・ R&R Associates ・ R&R Group ・ R&R Ice Cream ・ R v Owen ・ R v Pamajewon ・ R v Pan; R v Sawyer ・ R v Panel on Take-overs and Mergers, ex p Datafin plc ・ R v Park ・ R v Parks ・ R v Patel ・ R v Patrick ・ R v Peacock ・ R v Pearson; Ex parte Sipka ・ R v Penguin Books Ltd ・ R v Perka ・ R v Peverett ・ R v Plant ・ R v Powley ・ R v Prince ・ R v Pritchard ・ R v Prosper ・ R v Quick ・ R v Rahey ・ R v Reed ・ R v Registrar General, ex p Segerdal ・ R v Richards Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク R v Peacock ： ウィキペディア英語版 R v Peacock R v Peacock was an English Crown Court case that was a test of the Obscene Publications Act 1959. In December 2009, the defendant, a male escort named Michael Peacock, had been charged by the Metropolitan Police for selling hardcore gay pornography that the police believed had the ability to "deprave or corrupt" the viewer, which was illegal under the Obscene Publications Act. He was subsequently acquitted through a trial by jury in January 2012. At the time, Peacock was the only individual to have successfully pleaded 'not guilty' under the Act in a case involving the kind of gay BDSM pornography which he published.〔 Legal experts said that, following the case, the Obscene Publications Act now "made no sense". It was also notable as one of the early cases in the English courts where live tweeting was a significant source of reporting and publicising the deliberations of the case following the 14 December 2011 guidance from the Lord Chief Justice which allowed tweeting in English Courts. ==Details of the case== 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「R v Peacock」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.